Pittsburgh Criminal Attorney Robert E Mielnicki was retained to represent J.L., a bookkeeper/controller for a local car dealer, who was charged with several counts of theft. At the end of a trial that lasted nearly one week, the Jury returned a verdict of not guilty as to all charges, apparently rejecting the prosecutor’s contention that J.L. as bookkeeper/controller was the only person who could have committed the crimes.
Pittsburgh Criminal Attorney Robert E Mielnicki was appointed to represent S.R., who was charged with Rape. The evidence presented by the prosecution, but disputed by defense counsel, was that S.R. had climbed through the window of the girls’ bedroom. At the end of a trial that lasted almost one week, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
Pittsburgh Criminal Attorney Robert E Mielnicki was appointed to represent J.C., an 18 year old charged with First Degree Murder. During a trial that lasted more than one week, the prosecutor introduced two eyewitnesses who testified that J.C. fired the shot that took the life of the victim. Attorney Mielnicki cross-examined one of these witnesses for close to eight hours. The jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
Pittsburgh Criminal Attorney Robert E Mielnicki was appointed to represent F.R. charged with the daylight armed robbery of a convenience store. The victim positively identified F.R. as the man who robbed him. The Jury indicated several times that it could not reach a verdict before the trial judge declared the Jury hung. The charges against F.R. were subsequently withdrawn.
Pittsburgh Criminal Attorney Robert E Mielnicki was appointed to represent J.R., who was charged with Possession with Intent to Deliver Marijuana and Possession. The prosecutor introduced evidence that J.R. was sitting on the drugs in a vehicle the police had stopped and, when they asked J.R. about the drugs, he stated such were his, but only for personal use. Despite this evidence, the Jury found J.R. not guilty of both charges.
Pittsburgh Criminal Attorney Robert E Mielnicki was appointed to represent T.M. who was charged with burglary of the restaurant/ bar he worked at as a nighttime custodian. After several days of trial, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty, apparently rejecting the prosecution theory that only T.M. could have committed the crime. The prosecutor introduced evidence of a deposit into the bank account of T.M. the day after the burglary for about the amount of money taken in the burglary. Attorney Mielnicki, however, was able to demonstrate through use of an interstate subpoena to a famous Atlantic City casino that T.M. had actually won approximately that amount of money gambling.
To speak with an attorney committed to providing you with the best possible defense, for a reasonable fee, contact Mielnicki & Stiffler, LLC at (412) 330-1000.